Implementing and up-scaling evidence-based eMental health in Europe: The study protocol for the MasterMind project
Permanent lenke
https://hdl.handle.net/10037/9001Dato
2015-10-19Type
Journal articleTidsskriftartikkel
Peer reviewed
Forfatter
Vis, Christiaan; Kleiboer, Annet; Prior, Reinhard; Bønes, Erlend; Cavallo, Marco; Clark, Stella Anne; Dozeman, Els; Ebert, David; Etzelmueller, Anne; Favaretto, Gerardo; Zabala, Ane Fullaondo; Kolstrup, Nils; Mancin, Silvia; Mathiassen, Kim; Myrbakk, Vemund Nordnes; Mol, Mayke; Jimenez, Jordi Piera; Power, Kevin; van Schaik, Anneke; Wright, Chris; Zanalda, Enrico; Pederson, Claus Duedal; Smit, Jan; Riper, Heleen; MasterMind, consortiumSammendrag
Background: Depressive disorder is a major societal challenge. Despite the availability of clinically and costeffective
treatments including Internet interventions, the number of patients receiving treatment is limited.
Evidence-based Internet interventions promise wide availability and high efficiency of treatments. However,
these interventions often do not enter routine mental healthcare delivery at a large scale. The MasterMind project
aims to provide insight into the factors that promote or hinder the uptake and implementation of evidence-based
Internet interventions by mental healthcare practice. Internet-based Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (iCBT) and
videoconferencing facilitating collaborative care (ccVC) will be implemented in routine mental healthcare. The
services will be offered to 5230 depressed adults in 15 European regions. The current paper describes the
evaluation protocol for this large-scale implementation project.
Design: Current summative evaluation study follows a naturalistic one-group pretest–posttest design and
assesses three distinct stakeholders: patients, mental healthcare professionals, and mental healthcare organisations.
The Model for Assessment of Telemedicine applications (MAST) will be employed to structure the implementation
and evaluation study. The primary focal points of interest are reach, clinical effect, acceptability,appropriateness, implementation costs, and sustainability of the interventions in practice. Mixed-methods are
used to provide an understanding of what (quantitative) the implementation projects have achieved and their
meaning to various stakeholders (qualitative).
Discussion: The use of Internet interventions in routine practice is limited. MasterMind attempts to bridge the gap
between routine practice and effectiveness research by evaluating the implementation of evidence-based Internet
interventions for depressive disorders in routine mental healthcare settings in Europe.
Beskrivelse
Published version also available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2015.10.002