Development of a feasible and responsive ultrasound inflammation score for rheumatoid arthritis through a data-driven approach
Permanent link
https://hdl.handle.net/10037/10795Date
2016-12-16Type
Journal articleTidsskriftartikkel
Peer reviewed
Author
Aga, Anna-Birgitte; Hammer, Hilde Berner; Olsen, Inge Christoffer; Uhlig, Till; Kvien, Tore Kristian; Heijde, Desirée van der; Fremstad, Hallvard; Madland, Tor Magne; Lexberg, Åse; Haukeland, Hilde; Rødevand, Erik; Høili, Christian; Stray, Hilde; Noraas, Anne Lindtner; Hansen, Inger Johanne Widding; Bakland, Gunnstein; Lillegraven, Siri; Lie, Elisabeth; Haavardsholm, Espen A.Abstract
Objective: To develop and validate a responsive and
feasible ultrasound inflammation score for rheumatoid
arthritis (RA).
Methods: We used data from cohorts of early RA
(development) and established RA starting/switching
biologic therapy (validation). 4 tendons and 36 joints
were examined by a grey scale (GSUS) and power
Doppler semiquantitative ultrasound (PDUS) scoring
system (full score). Ultrasound score components were
selected based on factor analyses of 3-month change
in the development cohort. Responsiveness was
assessed by standardised response means (SRMs). We
assessed the proportion of information retained from
the full score by linear regression.
Results: 118 patients with early and 212 patients with
established RA were included. The final ultrasound score
included 8 joints (metacarpophalangeal 1–2–3, proximal
interphalangeal 2–3, radiocarpal, metatarsophalangeal
2–3) and 1 tendon (extensor carpi ulnaris) examined
bilaterally. The 6-month SRMs for the final score were
−1.24 (95% CI −1.47 to −1.02) for GSUS, and −1.09
(−1.25 to −0.92) for PDUS in early RA, with 87% of
total information retained for GSUS and 90% for PDUS.
The new score performed somewhat better than
formerly proposed scores in the validation cohort.
Conclusions: The Ultrasound in Rheumatoid Arthritis 9
joint/tendon score (USRA9) inflammation score showed
good responsiveness, retained most of the information
from the original full score and overall performed better
than previous scores in a validation cohort.
Description
Published version. Source at http://doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2016-000325. License CC BY 4.0.