The components of a food traceability system
Background: Traceability of food products has become the focus of regional and national legislation, of many research and technical development initiatives and projects, and of many scientific articles. However, most of the scientific publications do not differentiate between the components of a traceability system, and those who do to some degree use inconsistent terminology and definitions. This weakens the analysis and the conclusions, and it can lead to misunderstanding in relation to what a traceability system is, what the components are, and how system functionality can be improved.
Scope and approach: This paper provides a structure for describing and analyzing a traceability system and emphasizes the difference between the system mechanisms as opposed to the attributes of the units that are traced. The basis for the classification outlined in this article is practical experience from traceability system implementations in the food industry, and participation in international standardization processes relating to food traceability. The references and the authors’ experience are from the food sector, but the component description is likely to be relevant and applicable to any product traceability system in a supply chain.
‘Traceability system’ is used as a generic term in this article, encompassing the principles, practices, and standards needed to achieve traceability of food products, regardless of how these are implemented. In practice in the food industry, most traceability systems are computerized and they are implemented through extensive use of information and communications technology (ICT), but in principle a traceability system could be manual and paper-based (as was indeed common practice only a few years ago), and the components hierarchy outlined in this article would still be applicable.
Key findings and conclusions: This paper identifies the general components of a traceability system to be the identification of the units under consideration, the recording of the joining and splitting of these units as they move through the supply chain (the transformations), and the recording of the unit attributes. The distinction between the different components is particularly important when describing and comparing traceability systems, and when recommending improvements. In both these cases, the respective components need to be considered separately.
Is part ofOlsen, P. (2018). Food traceability in theory and in practice. (Doctoral thesis). https://hdl.handle.net/10037/15408
CitationOlsen, P. & Borit, M. (2018). The components of a food traceability system. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 77, 143-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2018.05.004
MetadataShow full item record
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Factors affecting implementation of the information exchange for traceability in food supply chains Donnelly, Kathryn Anne-Marie (Doctoral thesis; Doktorgradsavhandling, 2010-11-04)The globalisation and intensification of food production has led to food related health incidents. These incidents range from BSE in cattle to illegally high levels of dioxins in chicken feed (Carriquiry and Babcock, 2007, Caswell, 2000, Elbers et al., 2001, Fallon, 2001, Hobbs, 2004, Madec et al., 2001, Ozawa et al., 2001, Sporleder and Goldsmith, 2001). The modern consumer is increasingly ...
Trust and traceability. Using culturally tailored environmental risk communication and transparency as trust-building tools Borit, Melania (Doctoral thesis; Doktorgradsavhandling, 2014-04-14)The trust of the Norwegian public in the petroleum industry is low, especially when it comes to trusting the industry’s environmental discourse. The present study suggests solutions to overcoming this trust problem. Having complexity science as underlying theory, this research builds up on the ideas that: a) risk communication is more effective if it is adapted to the culture of the audience, and ...
Application of traceability in deterrence of illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing : an analysis model of EU Regulation 1005/2008 and EU Regulation Proposal 2008/0216 (CNS) Borit, Melania (Master thesis; Mastergradsoppgave, 2009-05-15)Two of the three new pillars of the European Union Common Fisheries Policy (EU Regulation 1005/2008; EU Regulation Proposal 2008/0216 (CNS)) were explicitly developed to address the illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing concern. These regulations attempt to introduce market monitoring measures that prevent IUU fish from entering legitimate trade channels in the Community. The leading purpose ...