dc.contributor.author | Harper, Lynsey R. | |
dc.contributor.author | Buxton, Andrew S. | |
dc.contributor.author | Rees, Helen C. | |
dc.contributor.author | Bruce, Kat | |
dc.contributor.author | Brys, Rein | |
dc.contributor.author | Halfmaerten, David | |
dc.contributor.author | Read, Daniel S. | |
dc.contributor.author | Watson, Hayley V. | |
dc.contributor.author | Sayer, Carl D. | |
dc.contributor.author | Jones, Elanor P. | |
dc.contributor.author | Priestley, Victoria | |
dc.contributor.author | Mächler, Elvira | |
dc.contributor.author | Múrria, Cesc | |
dc.contributor.author | Garcès-Pastor, Sandra | |
dc.contributor.author | Medupin, Cecilia | |
dc.contributor.author | Burgess, Katherine | |
dc.contributor.author | Benson, Gillian | |
dc.contributor.author | Boonham, Neil | |
dc.contributor.author | Griffiths, Richard A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Handley, Lori Lawson | |
dc.contributor.author | Hänfling, Bernd | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-05-16T12:08:40Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-05-16T12:08:40Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018-09-03 | |
dc.description.abstract | Environmental DNA (eDNA) analysis is a
rapid, non-invasive, cost-efficient biodiversity monitoring tool with enormous potential to inform aquatic
conservation and management. Development is ongoing, with strong commercial interest, and new uses are
continually being discovered. General applications of
eDNA and guidelines for best practice in freshwater
systems have been established, but habitat-specific
assessments are lacking. Ponds are highly diverse, yet
understudied systems that could benefit from eDNA
monitoring. However, eDNA applications in ponds
and methodological constraints specific to these
environments remain unaddressed. Following a stakeholder workshop in 2017, researchers combined
knowledge and expertise to review these applications
and challenges that must be addressed for the future
and consistency of eDNA monitoring in ponds. The
greatest challenges for pond eDNA surveys are
representative sampling, eDNA capture, and potential
PCR inhibition. We provide recommendations for
sampling, eDNA capture, inhibition testing, and
laboratory practice, which should aid new and ongoing
eDNA projects in ponds. If implemented, these
recommendations will contribute towards an eventual
broad standardisation of eDNA research and practice,
with room to tailor workflows for optimal analysis and different applications. Such standardisation will
provide more robust, comparable, and ecologically
meaningful data to enable effective conservation and
management of pond biodiversity. | en_US |
dc.description | Source at <a href=https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-018-3750-5>https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-018-3750-5. </a> | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Harper, L.R., Buxton, A.S., Rees, H.S., Bruce, K., Brys, R., Halfmaerten, D. ... Hänfling, B. (2018). Prospects and challenges of environmental DNA (eDNA) monitoring in freshwater ponds. <i>Hydrobiologia, 826</i>(1), 25-41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-018-3750-5 | en_US |
dc.identifier.cristinID | FRIDAID 1621673 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s10750-018-3750-5 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0018-8158 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1573-5117 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10037/15320 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Springer | en_US |
dc.relation.journal | Hydrobiologia | |
dc.rights.accessRights | openAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Aquatic | en_US |
dc.subject | Biodiversity | en_US |
dc.subject | Lentic | en_US |
dc.subject | Metabarcoding | en_US |
dc.subject | Quantitative | en_US |
dc.subject | PCR | en_US |
dc.subject | Survey | en_US |
dc.subject | VDP::Mathematics and natural science: 400::Zoology and botany: 480 | en_US |
dc.subject | VDP::Matematikk og Naturvitenskap: 400::Zoologiske og botaniske fag: 480 | en_US |
dc.title | Prospects and challenges of environmental DNA (eDNA) monitoring in freshwater ponds | en_US |
dc.type | Journal article | en_US |
dc.type | Tidsskriftartikkel | en_US |
dc.type | Peer reviewed | en_US |