ub.xmlui.mirage2.page-structure.muninLogoub.xmlui.mirage2.page-structure.openResearchArchiveLogo
    • EnglishEnglish
    • norsknorsk
  • Velg spraakEnglish 
    • EnglishEnglish
    • norsknorsk
  • Administration/UB
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Det helsevitenskapelige fakultet
  • Institutt for klinisk medisin
  • Artikler, rapporter og annet (klinisk medisin)
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Det helsevitenskapelige fakultet
  • Institutt for klinisk medisin
  • Artikler, rapporter og annet (klinisk medisin)
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Isoflurane increases tolerance to renal ischemia reperfusion injury compared to propofol: An experimental study in pigs

Permanent link
https://hdl.handle.net/10037/17955
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/08941939.2019.1637038
Thumbnail
View/Open
article.pdf (941.2Kb)
Accepted manuscript version (PDF)
Date
2019-07-09
Type
Journal article
Tidsskriftartikkel
Peer reviewed

Author
Roaldsen, Marius Håke; Ciosek, Timothy Allan; Richardsen, Elin; Al-Saad, Samer; Patel, Hitendra R.H.; Aarsæther, Erling Johan
Abstract
Purpose: To compare two clinically relevant anesthetic agents, i.e., isoflurane versus propofol with respect to protection of the kidney in a porcine renal ischemia reperfusion model.

Materials and Methods: 14 hybrid pigs were randomized to anesthesia with either isoflurane or propofol prior to laparoscopic surgery. Following anesthesia, the left kidney hilum was clamped for 60 min and the right kidney removed. After 48 h of reperfusion, urine was sampled for analysis of neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), albumin, and creatinine. The left kidney was harvested for histologic scoring of injury.

Results: Histologic examination of renal injury revealed a statistically significant difference in favor of isoflurane on denuded basement membrane score (isoflurane group 1.58 ± 0.38 vs. propofol 2.42 ± 0.80, p = .026). Median (25–75 percentile) urinary albumin 3.4 g/L (2.25–7.48) vs. 8.9 g/L (3.73–13.8), (p = .041) and urinary albumin/creatinine ratio 1.17 (0.76–1.82) vs. 1.76 (1.63–5.99), (p = .026) were both significantly lower in the isoflurane group. Median (25–75 percentile) urinary NGAL was 167 (51–215) pg/ml in the isoflurane group compared with 362 (149–508) pg/ml in the propofol group (p = .093).

Conclusion: Isoflurane increases tolerance to renal ischemia reperfusion injury compared to propofol in this model.

Description
This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of investigate surgery on 09 July 2019. Final version including figures, is available online: https://doi.org/10.1080/08941939.2019.1637038.
Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Citation
Roaldsen MH, Ciosek TA, Richardsen ER, Al-Saad SAS, Patel HR, Aarsæther EJ. Isoflurane increases tolerance to renal ischemia reperfusion injury compared to propofol: An experimental study in pigs. Journal of investigative surgery. 2019:1-8
Metadata
Show full item record
Collections
  • Artikler, rapporter og annet (klinisk medisin) [1974]
Copyright © 2019 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC

Browse

Browse all of MuninCommunities & CollectionsAuthor listTitlesBy Issue DateBrowse this CollectionAuthor listTitlesBy Issue Date
Login

Statistics

View Usage Statistics
UiT

Munin is powered by DSpace

UiT The Arctic University of Norway
The University Library
uit.no/ub - munin@ub.uit.no

Accessibility statement (Norwegian only)