Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBragstad, Line Kildal
dc.contributor.authorHjelle, Ellen Gabrielsen
dc.contributor.authorZucknick, Manuela
dc.contributor.authorSveen, Unni
dc.contributor.authorThommessen, Bente
dc.contributor.authorBronken, Berit Arnesveen
dc.contributor.authorMartinsen, Randi
dc.contributor.authorKitzmüller, Gabriele
dc.contributor.authorMangset, Margrete
dc.contributor.authorKvigne, Kari Johanne
dc.contributor.authorHilari, Katerina
dc.contributor.authorLightbody, C. Elizabeth
dc.contributor.authorKirkevold, Marit
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-19T13:58:13Z
dc.date.available2020-08-19T13:58:13Z
dc.date.issued2020-06-10
dc.description.abstract<i>Objective:</i> To evaluate the effect of a dialogue-based intervention targeting psychosocial well-being at 12 months post-stroke.<p> <p><i>Design:</i> Multicenter, prospective, randomized, assessor-blinded, controlled trial with two parallel groups.<p> <p><i>Setting:</i> Community.<p> <p><i>Subjects:</i> Three-hundred and twenty-two adults (⩾18 years) with stroke within the last four weeks were randomly allocated into intervention group (n = 166) or control group (n = 156).<p> <p><i>Interventions:</i> The intervention group received a dialogue-based intervention to promote psychosocial well-being, comprising eight individual 1–1½ hour sessions delivered during the first six months post-stroke.<p> <p><i>Main measures:</i> The primary outcome measure was the General Health Questionnaire-28 (GHQ-28). Secondary outcome measures included the Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale-39g, the Sense of Coherence scale, and the Yale Brown single-item questionnaire.<p> <p><i>Results:</i> The mean (SD) age of the participants was 66.8 (12.1) years in the intervention group and 65.7 (13.3) years in the control group. At 12 months post-stroke, the mean (SE) GHQ-28 score was 20.6 (0.84) in the intervention group and 19.9 (0.85) in the control group. There were no between-group differences in psychosocial well-being at 12 months post-stroke (mean difference: −0.74, 95% confidence interval (CI): −3.08, 1.60). The secondary outcomes showed no statistically significant between-group difference in health-related quality of life, sense of coherence, or depression at 12 months.<p> <p><i>Conclusion:</i> The results of this trial did not demonstrate lower levels of emotional distress and anxiety or higher levels of health-related quality of life in the intervention group (dialogue-based intervention) as compared to the control group (usual care) at 12 months post-stroke.en_US
dc.identifier.citationBragstad LK, Hjelle EGH, Zucknick M, Sveen US, Thommessen B, Bronken B, Martinsen RE, Kitzmüller GE, Mangset M, Kvigne K, Hilari K, Lightbody, Kirkevold M. The effects of a dialogue-based intervention to promote psychosocial well-being after stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Clinical Rehabilitation. 2020;34(8):1056-1071en_US
dc.identifier.cristinIDFRIDAID 1815066
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0269215520929737
dc.identifier.issn0269-2155
dc.identifier.issn1477-0873
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10037/19056
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSAGE Publicationsen_US
dc.relation.journalClinical Rehabilitation
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EU/FP7-PEOPLE/609020/Norway/SCIENTIA-FELLOWS: International Postdoctoral Fellowship Programme//en_US
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccessen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2020 The Author(s)en_US
dc.subjectVDP::Medical disciplines: 700::Health sciences: 800en_US
dc.subjectVDP::Medisinske Fag: 700::Helsefag: 800en_US
dc.titleThe effects of a dialogue-based intervention to promote psychosocial well-being after stroke: a randomized controlled trialen_US
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typeTidsskriftartikkelen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US


File(s) in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record