Non-radiologist-performed abdominal point-of-care ultrasonography in paediatrics — a scoping review
Permanent lenke
https://hdl.handle.net/10037/22802Dato
2021-04-10Type
Journal articleTidsskriftartikkel
Peer reviewed
Forfatter
van Wassenaer, Elsa A.; Daams, Joost G.; Benninga, Marc A.; Rosendahl, Karen; Koot, Bart G.P.; Stafrace, Samuel; Arthurs, Owen J.; van Rijn, Rick R.Sammendrag
Background - Historically, US in the paediatric setting has mostly been the domain of radiologists. However, in the last decade, there has been an uptake of non-radiologist point-of-care US.
Objective - To gain an overview of abdominal non-radiologist point-of-care US in paediatrics.
Materials and methods - We conducted a scoping review regarding the uses of abdominal non-radiologist point-of-care US, quality of examinations and training, patient perspective, financial costs and legal consequences following the use of non-radiologist point-of-care US. We conducted an advanced search of the following databases: Medline, Embase and Web of Science Conference Proceedings. We included published original research studies describing abdominal non-radiologist point-of-care US in children. We limited studies to English-language articles from Western countries.
Results - We found a total of 5,092 publications and selected 106 publications for inclusion: 39 studies and 51 case reports or case series on the state-of-art of abdominal non-radiologist point-of-care US, 14 on training of non-radiologists, and 1 each on possible harms following non-radiologist point-of-care US and patient satisfaction. According to included studies, non-radiologist point-of-care US is increasingly used, but no standardised training guidelines exist. We found no studies regarding the financial consequences of non-radiologist point-of-care US.
Conclusion - This scoping review supports the further development of non-radiologist point-of-care US and underlines the need for consensus on who can do which examination after which level of training among US performers. More research is needed on training non-radiologists and on the costs-to-benefits of non-radiologist point-of-care US.
Objective - To gain an overview of abdominal non-radiologist point-of-care US in paediatrics.
Materials and methods - We conducted a scoping review regarding the uses of abdominal non-radiologist point-of-care US, quality of examinations and training, patient perspective, financial costs and legal consequences following the use of non-radiologist point-of-care US. We conducted an advanced search of the following databases: Medline, Embase and Web of Science Conference Proceedings. We included published original research studies describing abdominal non-radiologist point-of-care US in children. We limited studies to English-language articles from Western countries.
Results - We found a total of 5,092 publications and selected 106 publications for inclusion: 39 studies and 51 case reports or case series on the state-of-art of abdominal non-radiologist point-of-care US, 14 on training of non-radiologists, and 1 each on possible harms following non-radiologist point-of-care US and patient satisfaction. According to included studies, non-radiologist point-of-care US is increasingly used, but no standardised training guidelines exist. We found no studies regarding the financial consequences of non-radiologist point-of-care US.
Conclusion - This scoping review supports the further development of non-radiologist point-of-care US and underlines the need for consensus on who can do which examination after which level of training among US performers. More research is needed on training non-radiologists and on the costs-to-benefits of non-radiologist point-of-care US.
Forlag
SpringerSitering
van Wassenaer, Daams, Benninga, Rosendahl, Koot, Stafrace, Arthurs, van Rijn. Non-radiologist-performed abdominal point-of-care ultrasonography in paediatrics — a scoping review. Pediatric Radiology. 2021Metadata
Vis full innførselSamlinger
Copyright 2021 The Author(s)