Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorvan Wassenaer, Elsa A.
dc.contributor.authorDaams, Joost G.
dc.contributor.authorBenninga, Marc A.
dc.contributor.authorRosendahl, Karen
dc.contributor.authorKoot, Bart G.P.
dc.contributor.authorStafrace, Samuel
dc.contributor.authorArthurs, Owen J.
dc.contributor.authorvan Rijn, Rick R.
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-21T08:13:33Z
dc.date.available2021-10-21T08:13:33Z
dc.date.issued2021-04-10
dc.description.abstract<i>Background</i> - Historically, US in the paediatric setting has mostly been the domain of radiologists. However, in the last decade, there has been an uptake of non-radiologist point-of-care US.<br><br> <i>Objective</i> - To gain an overview of abdominal non-radiologist point-of-care US in paediatrics.<br><br> <i>Materials and methods</i> - We conducted a scoping review regarding the uses of abdominal non-radiologist point-of-care US, quality of examinations and training, patient perspective, financial costs and legal consequences following the use of non-radiologist point-of-care US. We conducted an advanced search of the following databases: Medline, Embase and Web of Science Conference Proceedings. We included published original research studies describing abdominal non-radiologist point-of-care US in children. We limited studies to English-language articles from Western countries.<br><br> <i>Results</i> - We found a total of 5,092 publications and selected 106 publications for inclusion: 39 studies and 51 case reports or case series on the state-of-art of abdominal non-radiologist point-of-care US, 14 on training of non-radiologists, and 1 each on possible harms following non-radiologist point-of-care US and patient satisfaction. According to included studies, non-radiologist point-of-care US is increasingly used, but no standardised training guidelines exist. We found no studies regarding the financial consequences of non-radiologist point-of-care US.<br><br> <i>Conclusion</i> - This scoping review supports the further development of non-radiologist point-of-care US and underlines the need for consensus on who can do which examination after which level of training among US performers. More research is needed on training non-radiologists and on the costs-to-benefits of non-radiologist point-of-care US.en_US
dc.identifier.citationvan Wassenaer, Daams, Benninga, Rosendahl, Koot, Stafrace, Arthurs, van Rijn. Non-radiologist-performed abdominal point-of-care ultrasonography in paediatrics — a scoping review. Pediatric Radiology. 2021en_US
dc.identifier.cristinIDFRIDAID 1918498
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00247-021-04997-x
dc.identifier.issn0301-0449
dc.identifier.issn1432-1998
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10037/22802
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.relation.journalPediatric Radiology
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccessen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2021 The Author(s)en_US
dc.subjectVDP::Medical disciplines: 700en_US
dc.subjectVDP::Medisinske Fag: 700en_US
dc.titleNon-radiologist-performed abdominal point-of-care ultrasonography in paediatrics — a scoping reviewen_US
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typeTidsskriftartikkelen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel