Cardiac troponin I and T for ruling out coronary artery disease in suspected chronic coronary syndrome
Permanent link
https://hdl.handle.net/10037/25097Date
2022-01-18Type
Journal articleTidsskriftartikkel
Peer reviewed
Author
Tveit, Sjur Hansen; Myhre, Peder Langeland; Hanssen, Tove Aminda; Forsdahl, Signe Helene; Iqbal, Amjid; Omland, Torbjørn; Schirmer, HenrikAbstract
To compare the performance of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I and T (hs-cTnI; hs-cTnT) in
diagnosing obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD50) in patients with suspected chronic coronary
syndrome (CCS). A total of 706 patients with suspected CCS, referred for Coronary Computed
Tomography Angiography, were included. cTn concentrations were measured using the Singulex
hs-cTnI (limit of detection [LoD] 0.08 ng/L) and Roche hs-cTnT (LoD 3 ng/L) assays. Obstructive
coronary artery disease (CAD50) was defned as ≥ 50% coronary stenosis. Cardiovascular risk was
determined by the NORRISK2-score. Median age of the patients was 65 (range 28–87) years, 35%
were women. All patients had hs-cTnI concentrations above the LoD (median 1.9 [Q1-3 1.2–3.6]
ng/L), 72% had hs-cTnT above the LoD (median 5 [Q1-3 2–11] ng/L). There was a graded relationship
between hs-cTn concentrations and coronary artery calcium. Only hs-cTnI remained associated with
CAD50 in adjusted analyses (OR 1.20 95% Confdence Interval [1.05–1.38]), p = 0.009). The C-statistics
for hs-cTnI and hs-cTnT were 0.65 (95% CI [0.60–0.69]) and 0.60 (0.56–0.64). The highest specifcity
and negative predictive values for CAD50 were in the lowest NORRISK2-tertile. hs-cTn concentrations
provide diagnostic information in patients with suspected CCS, with superior performance of hs-cTnI
compared to hs-cTnT in regard to CAD50. The diagnostic performance appeared best in those with low
cardiovascular risk.
Publisher
NatureCitation
Tveit SH, Myhre PL, Hanssen TA, Forsdahl SH, Iqbal A, Omland T, Schirmer H. Cardiac troponin I and T for ruling out coronary artery disease in suspected chronic coronary syndrome. Scientific Reports. 2022;12:945Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
Copyright 2022 The Author(s)