Evaluating the suitability of the Low Energy Availability in Females Questionnaire (LEAF-Q) for female footballers
Permanent link
https://hdl.handle.net/10037/30757Date
2023-07-13Type
Journal articleTidsskriftartikkel
Peer reviewed
Author
Dasa, Marcus Småvik; Friborg, Oddgeir; Kristoffersen, Morten; Pettersen, Gunn; Sagen, Jørn Vegard; Sundgot-Borgen, Jorunn; Rosenvinge, Jan HAbstract
Methods - The participants were classified as at risk (≥ 8) or not at risk (< 8) for persistent LEA and the Triad according to their LEAF-Q score, before being compared. Receiver operating curves were then conducted to examine the ability of the overall LEAF-Q and subcategories to correctly determine the presence of clinically defined markers of the Triad. Additionally, Youden’s index was calculated to determine the best fitting cut-off values.
Results - Thirty-two percent of participants were classified as at risk by the LEAF-Q. We found no statistically significant differences between the two groups for any markers associated with persistent LEA. Except for acceptable accuracy in determining menstrual status, all other LEAF-Q components exhibited poor accuracy and predictive values. Youden’s index scores imply that increasing the overall and injury cut-off values to ≥ 10 and ≥ 5 respectively, would yield increased performance.
Conclusions - Our findings do not support the use of the LEAF-Q for the purpose of detecting LEA and Triad conditions among female football players.