ub.xmlui.mirage2.page-structure.muninLogoub.xmlui.mirage2.page-structure.openResearchArchiveLogo
    • EnglishEnglish
    • norsknorsk
  • Velg spraaknorsk 
    • EnglishEnglish
    • norsknorsk
  • Administrasjon/UB
Vis innførsel 
  •   Hjem
  • Det helsevitenskapelige fakultet
  • Institutt for helse- og omsorgsfag
  • Artikler, rapporter og annet (helse- og omsorgsfag)
  • Vis innførsel
  •   Hjem
  • Det helsevitenskapelige fakultet
  • Institutt for helse- og omsorgsfag
  • Artikler, rapporter og annet (helse- og omsorgsfag)
  • Vis innførsel
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Screening outcome for interpretation by the first and second reader in a population-based mammographic screening program with independent double reading

Permanent lenke
https://hdl.handle.net/10037/32975
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/02841851231176272
Thumbnail
Åpne
article.pdf (917.4Kb)
Akseptert manusversjon (PDF)
Dato
2023-05-28
Type
Journal article
Tidsskriftartikkel
Peer reviewed

Forfatter
Hovda, Tone; Sagstad, Silje; Larsen, Marthe; Chen, Yan; Hofvind, Solveig Sand-Hanssen
Sammendrag
Background - Double reading of screening mammograms is associated with a higher rate of screen-detected cancer than single reading, but different strategies exist regarding reader pairing and blinding. Knowledge about these aspects is important when considering strategies for future use of artificial intelligence in mammographic screening.

Purpose - To investigate screening outcome, histopathological tumor characteristics, and mammographic features stratified by the first and the second reader in a population based screening program for breast cancer.

Material and Methods - The study sample consisted of data from 3,499,048 screening examinations from 834,691 women performed during 1996–2018 in BreastScreen Norway. All examinations were interpreted independently by two radiologists, 272 in total. We analyzed interpretation score, recall, and cancer detection, as well as histopathological tumor characteristics and mammographic features of the cancers, stratified by the first and second readers.

Results - For Reader 1, the rate of positive interpretations was 4.8%, recall 2.3%, and cancer detection 0.5%. The corresponding percentages for Reader 2 were 4.9%, 2.5%, and 0.5% (P < 0.05 compared with Reader 1). No statistical difference was observed for histopathological tumor characteristics or mammographic features when stratified by Readers 1 and 2. Recall and cancer detection were statistically higher and histopathological tumor characteristics less favorable for cases detected after concordant positive compared with discordant interpretations.

Conclusion - Despite reaching statistical significance, mainly due to the large study sample, we consider the differences in interpretation scores, recall, and cancer detection between the first and second readers to be clinically negligible. For practical and clinical purposes, double reading in BreastScreen Norway is independent.

Forlag
SAGE Publications
Sitering
Hovda, Sagstad, Larsen, Chen, Hofvind. Screening outcome for interpretation by the first and second reader in a population-based mammographic screening program with independent double reading. Acta Radiologica. 2023
Metadata
Vis full innførsel
Samlinger
  • Artikler, rapporter og annet (helse- og omsorgsfag) [842]
Copyright 2023 The Author(s)

Bla

Bla i hele MuninEnheter og samlingerForfatterlisteTittelDatoBla i denne samlingenForfatterlisteTittelDato
Logg inn

Statistikk

Antall visninger
UiT

Munin bygger på DSpace

UiT Norges Arktiske Universitet
Universitetsbiblioteket
uit.no/ub - munin@ub.uit.no

Tilgjengelighetserklæring