dc.contributor.author | Seredkina, Natalya | |
dc.contributor.author | van der Vlag, Johan | |
dc.contributor.author | Berden, Jo | |
dc.contributor.author | Mortensen, Elin Synnøve | |
dc.contributor.author | Rekvig, Ole Petter | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-05-28T08:12:11Z | |
dc.date.available | 2014-05-28T08:12:11Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2013 | |
dc.description.abstract | Autoantibodies to components of chromatin, which include double-stranded DNA (dsDNA), histones and nucleosomes, are central
in the pathogenesis of lupus nephritis. How anti-chromatin autoantibodies exert their nephritogenic activity, however, is controversial.
One model assumes that autoantibodies initiate inflammation when they cross-react with intrinsic glomerular structures such
as components of membranes, matrices or exposed nonchromatin ligands released from cells. Another model suggests glomerular
deposition of autoantibodies in complex with chromatin, thereby inducing classic immune complex–mediated tissue damage. Recent
data suggest acquired error of renal chromatin degradation due to the loss of renal DNaseI enzyme activity is an important
contributing factor to the development of lupus nephritis in lupus-prone (NZBxNZW)F1 mice and in patients with lupus nephritis. Downregulation
of DNaseI expression results in reduced chromatin fragmentation and in deposition of extracellular chromatin–IgG complexes
in glomerular basement membranes in individuals who produce IgG anti-chromatin autoantibodies. The main focus of the
present review is to discuss whether exposed chromatin fragments in glomeruli are targeted by potentially nephritogenic anti-dsDNA
autoantibodies or if the nephritogenic activity of these autoantibodies is explained by cross-reaction with intrinsic glomerular constituents
or if both models coexist in diseased kidneys. In addition, the role of silencing of the renal DNaseI gene and the biological
consequences of reduced chromatin fragmentation in nephritic kidneys are discussed. | en |
dc.identifier.citation | Molecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass. Print) 19(2013) s. 161-169 | en |
dc.identifier.cristinID | FRIDAID 1114465 | |
dc.identifier.doi | http://dx.doi.org/10.2119/molmed.2013.00010 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1076-1551 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10037/6325 | |
dc.identifier.urn | URN:NBN:no-uit_munin_5909 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | en |
dc.publisher | Feinstein Institute for Medical Research | en |
dc.rights.accessRights | openAccess | |
dc.subject | VDP::Medical disciplines: 700::Basic medical, dental and veterinary science disciplines: 710::Physiopathology: 721 | en |
dc.subject | VDP::Medisinske Fag: 700::Basale medisinske, odontologiske og veterinærmedisinske fag: 710::Patofysiologi: 721 | en |
dc.subject | VDP::Medical disciplines: 700::Clinical medical disciplines: 750::Nephrology, urology: 772 | en |
dc.subject | VDP::Medisinske Fag: 700::Klinisk medisinske fag: 750::Nefrologi, urologi: 772 | en |
dc.title | Lupus Nephritis: Enigmas, Conflicting Models and an Emerging Concept | en |
dc.type | Journal article | en |
dc.type | Tidsskriftartikkel | en |
dc.type | Peer reviewed | en |