Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorMelsom, Toralf
dc.contributor.authorFuskevåg, Ole-Martin
dc.contributor.authorMathisen, Ulla Dorte
dc.contributor.authorStrand, Harald
dc.contributor.authorSchei, Jørgen
dc.contributor.authorJenssen, Trond Geir
dc.contributor.authorSolbu, Marit Dahl
dc.contributor.authorEriksen, Bjørn Odvar
dc.date.accessioned2016-02-23T15:10:43Z
dc.date.available2016-02-23T15:10:43Z
dc.date.issued2015-01-23
dc.description.abstractBackground: Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) based on either cystatin C or creatinine perform similarly in estimating measured GFR, but associate differently with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and mortality. This could be due to confounding by non-GFRrelated traits associated with cystatin C and creatinine levels. We investigated non-GFRrelated associations between eGFR and two types of non-traditional risk factors for CVD and death: L-arginine/dimethylarginine metabolism and insulin resistance. <p>Methods: GFR was measured via iohexol clearance in a cross-sectional study of 1,624 middle-aged persons from the general population without CVD, diabetes or chronic kidney disease. The dimethylarginines were measured using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MSMS). Insulin resistance was determined by the homeostasis model assessment (HOMA-IR). <p>Results: Asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA), symmetric dimethylarginine (SDMA), the L-arginine/ADMA ratio, and insulin resistance were associated with creatinine-based eGFR after accounting for measured GFR in multivariable adjusted analyses. The cystatin C-based eGFR showed a similar residual association with SDMA; an oppositely directed, borderline significant association with ADMA; and a stronger residual association with insulin resistance compared with eGFR based on creatinine. <p>Conclusion: Both creatinine- and cystatin C-based eGFR are influenced by non-traditional risk factors, which may bias risk prediction by eGFR in longitudinal studies.en_US
dc.descriptionThis is the accepted manuscript version. Published version available at <a href=http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000371557>http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000371557</a>en_US
dc.identifier.citationAmerican Journal of Nephrology 2015, 41(1):7-15en_US
dc.identifier.cristinIDFRIDAID 1252115
dc.identifier.doi10.1159/000371557
dc.identifier.issn1421-9670
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10037/8542
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-uit_munin_8109
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherKargeren_US
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccess
dc.subjectVDP::Medisinske Fag: 700::Klinisk medisinske fag: 750::Kardiologi: 771en_US
dc.subjectVDP::Medical disciplines: 700::Clinical medical disciplines: 750::Cardiology: 771en_US
dc.titleEstimated GFR is biased by non-traditional cardiovascular risk factorsen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typeTidsskriftartikkelen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel