ub.xmlui.mirage2.page-structure.muninLogoub.xmlui.mirage2.page-structure.openResearchArchiveLogo
    • EnglishEnglish
    • norsknorsk
  • Velg spraaknorsk 
    • EnglishEnglish
    • norsknorsk
  • Administrasjon/UB
Vis innførsel 
  •   Hjem
  • Det helsevitenskapelige fakultet
  • Institutt for samfunnsmedisin
  • Artikler, rapporter og annet (samfunnsmedisin)
  • Vis innførsel
  •   Hjem
  • Det helsevitenskapelige fakultet
  • Institutt for samfunnsmedisin
  • Artikler, rapporter og annet (samfunnsmedisin)
  • Vis innførsel
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Symptoms, signs, and tests: The general practitioner's comprehensive approach towards a cancer diagnosis

Permanent lenke
https://hdl.handle.net/10037/8560
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3109/02813432.2015.1067512
Thumbnail
Åpne
article.pdf (441.8Kb)
(PDF)
Dato
2015-09-16
Type
Journal article
Tidsskriftartikkel
Peer reviewed

Forfatter
Scheel, Benedicte; Holtedahl, Knut A.
Sammendrag
Objective. To study the relative importance of different tools a GP can use during the diagnostic process towards cancer detection.

Design. Retrospective cohort study with prospective registration of cancer in general practice. Setting and subjects. One hundred and fi fty-seven Norwegian general practitioners (GPs) reported 261 cancer patients.

Method. During 10 consecutive days, GPs registered all patient consultations and recorded any presence of seven focal symptoms and three general symptoms, commonly considered as warning signs of cancer (WSC). Follow-up was done six to 11 months later. For each patient with new or recurrent cancer, the GP completed a questionnaire with medical-record-based information concerning the diagnostic procedure.

Results. In 78% of cancer cases, symptoms, signs, or tests helped diagnose cancer. In 90 cases, there were 131 consultation-recorded WSC that seemed related to the cancer. Further symptoms were reported for another 74 cases. Different clinical signs were noted in 41 patients, 16 of whom had no previous recording of symptoms. Supplementary tests added information in 59 cases; in 25 of these there were no recordings of symptoms or signs. Sensitivity of any cancer-relevant symptom or clinical fi nding ranged from 100% for patients with uterine body cancer to 57% for patients with renal cancer.

Conclusion. WSC had a major role as initiator of a cancer diagnostic procedure. Low-risk-butnot-no-risk symptoms also played an important role, and in 7% of patients they were the only symptoms. Clinical fi ndings and/or supplementary procedures were sometimes decisive for rapid referral.

Beskrivelse
Published version, also available at http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/02813432.2015.1067512 License: Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by/4.0/)
Forlag
Taylor & Francis Open
Sitering
Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care 2015, 33:170-177
Metadata
Vis full innførsel
Samlinger
  • Artikler, rapporter og annet (samfunnsmedisin) [1514]

Bla

Bla i hele MuninEnheter og samlingerForfatterlisteTittelDatoBla i denne samlingenForfatterlisteTittelDato
Logg inn

Statistikk

Antall visninger
UiT

Munin bygger på DSpace

UiT Norges Arktiske Universitet
Universitetsbiblioteket
uit.no/ub - munin@ub.uit.no

Tilgjengelighetserklæring