Cost-effectiveness of molecularly matched off-label therapies for end-stage cancer–the MetAction precision medicine study
Permanent lenke
https://hdl.handle.net/10037/27136Dato
2022-08-09Type
Journal articleTidsskriftartikkel
Peer reviewed
Forfatter
Ree, Anne Hansen; Mælandsmo, Gunhild Mari; Flatmark, Kjersti; Russnes, Hege Elisabeth Giercksky; Casteneda, Monica Gomez; Aas, ElineSammendrag
Methods: We designed three partitioned survival models to evaluate the healthcare costs and qualityadjusted life years (QALYs) as the main outcomes. Cost-effectiveness was calculated as the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of PCM relative to BSC with an annual willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of EUR 56,384 (NOK 605,000). One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses addressed uncertainty.
Results: We estimated total healthcare costs (relating to next-generation sequencing (NGS) equipment and personnel wages, molecularly matched medications to the patients with an actionable tumour target and follow-up of the responding patients) and the health outcomes for the MetAction patients versus costs (relating to estimated hospital admission) and outcomes for the BSC cases. The ICERs for incremental QALYs were twice or more as high as the WTP threshold and relatively insensitive to cost decrease of the NGS procedures, while reduction of medication prices would contribute significantly towards a cost-effective PCM strategy.
Conclusions: The models suggested that the high ICERs of PCM were driven by costs of the NGS diagnostics and molecularly matched medications, with a likelihood for the strategy to be cost-effective defying WTP constraints. Reducing drug expenses to half the list price would likely result in an ICER at the WTP threshold. This can be an incentive for a public-private partnership for sharing drug costs in PCM, exemplified by ongoing European initiatives.