dc.contributor.author | Ree, Anne Hansen | |
dc.contributor.author | Mælandsmo, Gunhild Mari | |
dc.contributor.author | Flatmark, Kjersti | |
dc.contributor.author | Russnes, Hege Elisabeth Giercksky | |
dc.contributor.author | Casteneda, Monica Gomez | |
dc.contributor.author | Aas, Eline | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-10-26T09:19:04Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-10-26T09:19:04Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022-08-09 | |
dc.description.abstract | Background: Precision cancer medicine (PCM), frequently used for the expensive and often modestly
efficacious off-label treatment with medications matched to the tumour genome of end-stage cancer,
challenges healthcare resources. We compared the health effects, costs and cost-effectiveness of our
MetAction PCM study with corresponding data from comparator populations given best supportive
care (BSC) in two external randomised controlled trials.<p>
<p>Methods: We designed three partitioned survival models to evaluate the healthcare costs and qualityadjusted life years (QALYs) as the main outcomes. Cost-effectiveness was calculated as the incremental
cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of PCM relative to BSC with an annual willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold
of EUR 56,384 (NOK 605,000). One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses addressed uncertainty.
<p>Results: We estimated total healthcare costs (relating to next-generation sequencing (NGS) equipment
and personnel wages, molecularly matched medications to the patients with an actionable tumour target and follow-up of the responding patients) and the health outcomes for the MetAction patients
versus costs (relating to estimated hospital admission) and outcomes for the BSC cases. The ICERs for
incremental QALYs were twice or more as high as the WTP threshold and relatively insensitive to cost
decrease of the NGS procedures, while reduction of medication prices would contribute significantly
towards a cost-effective PCM strategy.
<p>Conclusions: The models suggested that the high ICERs of PCM were driven by costs of the NGS diagnostics and molecularly matched medications, with a likelihood for the strategy to be cost-effective
defying WTP constraints. Reducing drug expenses to half the list price would likely result in an ICER at
the WTP threshold. This can be an incentive for a public-private partnership for sharing drug costs in
PCM, exemplified by ongoing European initiatives. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Ree AH, Mælandsmo GM, Flatmark K, Russnes HE, Casteneda, Aas E. Cost-effectiveness of molecularly matched off-label therapies for end-stage cancer–the MetAction precision medicine study. Acta Oncologica. 2022;61(8):955-962 | en_US |
dc.identifier.cristinID | FRIDAID 2056276 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/0284186X.2022.2098053 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0284-186X | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1651-226X | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10037/27136 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Taylor & Francis | en_US |
dc.relation.journal | Acta Oncologica | |
dc.rights.accessRights | openAccess | en_US |
dc.rights.holder | Copyright 2022 The Author(s) | en_US |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 | en_US |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) | en_US |
dc.title | Cost-effectiveness of molecularly matched off-label therapies for end-stage cancer–the MetAction precision medicine study | en_US |
dc.type.version | publishedVersion | en_US |
dc.type | Journal article | en_US |
dc.type | Tidsskriftartikkel | en_US |
dc.type | Peer reviewed | en_US |