ub.xmlui.mirage2.page-structure.muninLogoub.xmlui.mirage2.page-structure.openResearchArchiveLogo
    • EnglishEnglish
    • norsknorsk
  • Velg spraakEnglish 
    • EnglishEnglish
    • norsknorsk
  • Administration/UB
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Fakultet for humaniora, samfunnsvitenskap og lærerutdanning
  • Institutt for samfunnsvitenskap
  • Artikler, rapporter og annet (samfunnsvitenskap)
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Fakultet for humaniora, samfunnsvitenskap og lærerutdanning
  • Institutt for samfunnsvitenskap
  • Artikler, rapporter og annet (samfunnsvitenskap)
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Hostile Film: Documentary as The Vehicle of Political Conflict

Permanent link
https://hdl.handle.net/10037/33251
Thumbnail
View/Open
article.pdf (263.4Kb)
Accepted manuscript version (PDF)
Date
2023
Type
Chapter
Bokkapittel

Author
Robinson, P. Stuart
Abstract
Documentary-film scholar Stella Bruzzi highlights the increasingly reflexive approach of contemporary independent filmmakers. Specifically, they commonly reflect on the collaborative performance entailed in depicting – and hence working with – human subjects, and therefore draw attention to—rather than hide—this intersubjective process, in all its artificiality and representative distance. In short, they show the workings. Awareness of such intersubjective performative potential enhances and makes more transparent the immanent power of film as speech-act, and challenges the conventional divide between documentary and fiction. It also raises new analytical possibilities, elaborated below. The focus is on the more vigorously political character of documentary filmmaking, not in terms of overt political text or slogans, but as direct intersubjective engagement – employing moving images – with a perceived ally or adversary. Documentary or “documentary style” examples, though shaped by the “new performativity,” are not necessarily transparent, either to their subjects or spectators. Their transparency is thus an important variable and question for analysis. The selected works’ power-dynamics are explored in ideological terms of the dialectics of antagonism, as hegemonic and counter-hegemonic discourse. The key questions for consideration are (i) the direct and local political effects of their impact on participating subjects, and (ii) their more indirect and exemplary effects, on the viewing public. The chosen material comprises three recent features placed in the context of an earlier and highly influential boundary-breaching example, Borat (Larry Charles, 2006). The paper builds, in this regard, on Lewis MacLeod’s interrogation of the ambivalent political dimension of Sacha Baron Cohen’s manipulative, quasi-fictional interventions. The works in question are Reindeer Island (Reindrømmen) (dir. Fridtjof Kjæreng, 2019), The White World According to Daliborek (Svet podle Daliborka) (dir. Vít Klusák, 2017) and Golden Dawn Girls (Hatets vugge) (dir. Håvard Bustnes, 2017).
Publisher
Cambridge Scholars Publishing
Citation
Robinson PS: Hostile Film: Documentary as The Vehicle of Political Conflict. In: Uzunoglu S, Baybars, Yilmaz. Discourses and Practices of Othering: Politics, Policy Making, and Media, 2023. Cambridge Scholars Publishing p. 142-163
Metadata
Show full item record
Collections
  • Artikler, rapporter og annet (samfunnsvitenskap) [305]
Copyright 2023 The Author(s)

Browse

Browse all of MuninCommunities & CollectionsAuthor listTitlesBy Issue DateBrowse this CollectionAuthor listTitlesBy Issue Date
Login

Statistics

View Usage Statistics
UiT

Munin is powered by DSpace

UiT The Arctic University of Norway
The University Library
uit.no/ub - munin@ub.uit.no

Accessibility statement (Norwegian only)